If you’re that mythical “ordinary” evangelical Christian, biblicism isn’t the sort of word you hear much in normal conversation. So if I were to guess how most of the evangelicals I grew up with would react naïvely to the concept of biblicism, I would guess that their initial reactions to the term would have positive connotations. On further reflection, I would point out that people are either going to react to the Bible or –ism parts of biblicism. As we react to the Bible part, we might guess that biblicism is a positive thing; as we react to the -ism part, we might guess it is negative.
For some reason, I believe this term has made a significant resurgence in evangelical discourse over about the past five years. I believe properly discussing the definition of that term would be helpful. To that end, what I propose is that biblicism should not really be definitely described, because different people use the term in different ways, but rather the term should be viewed as referring to a spectrum of attitudes and instincts, not a methodology or ideology per se, but rather as an informal aggregation of phenomena.
Continue reading “What is Biblicism?”